The Spurs skipper heavily linked with a move to the Etihad s and is supposedly hell-bent on leaving his boyhood club.
Harry Kane might be one of the world’s best strikers but he’s “not worth £160million”, insists Darren Bent.
Kane stirred up controversy by failing to report for Tottenham training after his summer holiday with the intention of forcing a move away from the club.
Frustrated with the lack of a single winners’ medal on his CV and the club’s ambition, the 28-year-old is said to be actively searching for pastures new.
A hefty £160 million price tag has reportedly been set on the 2020-21 Premier League Golden Boot winner, whose current contract will last until 2024.
“Harry Kane is one of the best centre-forward in the world, but he’s not worth £160million,” Bent told talkSPORT.
“He’s 28 years old now, he has had injuries… what are you going to get out of him, four or five years? I just dont think it justifies that much money.
“Man City have got the money to do it, but Pep Guardiola and the owners are probably thinking, ‘no, £160m is too much’.
“Maybe £100m or £120m, that’s more realistic for Harry Kane.
“But if Daniel Levy is saying he wants £140m, £150m, £160m and Manchester City are not prepared to pay that, no one is going to pay that. And then Harry is going to have to stay and play.”
Be sure not to miss out on the latest news about Manchester City
Download our brand new App and follow your favorite players, clubs, and much more
